I think you mis-understand my intention. I'm not questioning *if* it works. I'm simply wanting to understand how it works and what is or *is not* happening when running HHO. (on a finite level)
I've never questioned the "thousands" who are getting results. What I question is **why** they are getting better milage.
For instance, one guy found that removing all moisture from the supply line netted him zero gain in milage.
So based on that one account, how do you know for sure your not just creating a HHO/water injection system? Are you getting better milage from the water being misted in? And to what degree is it playing a part? 0%? 50% 100% ??? Would you see the exact same gain from a water injection kit alone? See what I'm getting at?
Efficiency is everything in any type of engine. Before I give this a try I want to understand what is efficient.. and what isn't.
One thing I do question and have seen zero proof of is the A/F ratio and EGTs. If a HHO kit is doing what folks claims and having no ill-effects... you'd see EGTs in line with near stock measurements. As far as A/F ratios measured by a wideband.. I'm just not sure what to expect. This to me is a HUGE clue in figuring out whats going on inside the CC.
btw, I have both of these measuring devices and *if* I choose to take this on I'll measure both then report.
Considering the cost involved I just might give it a try.
Regards,
Rich