Magnetic Resonance Amplifier

[oicu812]

AOH :: MRA4WK.TXT
4 weeks of messages on the MRA (Magnetic Resonance Amplifier)

From: Chris Flamig - 01/16/95 - FlamigNet - Grand Island, Ne - USA To:
ALL

This is as close to an exhaustive compiliation that I can achieve with
my limited resources, of the message base concerning the Magnetic
Resonance Amplifier, as found on KeelyNet-BBS, As of 01/16/1995 0:00
hrs.

A number of pertanant messages won't be found here, as I did not have
access to those folders, these are according to Joel McClain as
follows:

Messages: 9626, 9632, 9634, 9658, 9664, 9704, 9712, 9772, 9800, and
9801.

While some effort has been made to make the layout of the messages a
little more readiable, very little editing as been done, misspelling
were left as found, etc. Editing was mostly in layout... for use in
Windows Writer default margins using Arial 10 font, however it should
be veiwable in any text document viewer/editor.

I've compilied this set of messages pertaining to the MRA, in the
hopes that it will save everyone else, alot of the time and expense
involved in doing the screen capturing from the Non-stop Read mode of
the message base. And because I wanted to have all of this in one
package for easier local scanning.

I hope, you all find this useful, and enlightening. Someday, this
first month's worth of traffic on this device's development will aid
future historians in the search for enlightenment about things past.

God speed.... Chris Flamig

================================================== ========== * * * * *
================================================== ========== The
following messages are... From : KeelyNet BBS DataLine214)
324-3501 KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 A
FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

================================================== ==========

Message 8832 DATE/TIME: 10/09/94 16:22 From : JOEL MCCLAIN -- RECEIVED
-- To : JERRY DECKER (SYSOP) Subject: Piezo Test Folder : D, "Special
Associates Area Alpha"

Hi Jerry,

You remember those piezo's that you got from Tanners'? I've been
testing one of them, and have seen an "anomalous" effect, so maybe
some of the other experimenters will try. I put one of the piezos on
the top of a CB antenna, and connected the antenna to a square wave
generator. I tuned the generator until the piezo started to "sing",
and put a 'scope on it. At 7480Hz, the peak sine wave output from the
piezo is 8 volts at 37430Hz. In other words, frequency is being
multiplied by a factor of 5.00 times, and voltage is going from
millivolts of radiated signal to eight volts peak to peak. More
interesting is that when the piezo is resonated at 37430Hz, the output
goes up be 50 times to 400 volts.

If this can be duplicated, we may have a way to use piezos to convert
earth's naturally occuring background radiation into useful energy.

Joel ----------------------------------------

================================================== ==========

================================================== ========== NOTE:
What follows here is, as far as I can tell, the complete message base
from KeelyNet, pertaining to the MRA as of 01/16/95 1:00am -- Chris
Flamig ----------------------------------------
================================================== ==========

Message 9750 DATE/TIME: 12/07/94 23:41 From : JOEL MCCLAIN -- RECEIVED
-- To : GERALD O'DOCHARTY Subject: (R) Tetrahedron Coil Folder : D,
"Special Associates Area Alpha"

Hi Gerald,

Like your idea for the spinning magnetic field. 3-phase has a lot of
possibilities with tet design. Building it as you describe, but
instead of connecting the "Y" commons to ground, connect them to a
common center tap (neutral center) of the three delta windings, and
you will maintain all of the energy within the tet. If you use hollow
cores for the tet frame, you will be building coils which can be
resonated for power gains of 300% per coil X three coils, plus the
delta, which with its center tap is a series of Tesla tertiaries.

Determine the length and O.D. of the frame tubes, gage of wire to be
used and # of turns, and then you can determine the resonant freq. If
you calculate a resonant freq. that is equal to ferroresonance, ie,
175KHz +/- 5KHz, you will have a very powerful interferometer, and
probably the first of its kind...that we know of, anyway.

Stand back when you first tune it!

Joel ----------------------------------------
================================================== ==========

Message 9771 DATE/TIME: 12/09/94 13:32 From : JOEL MCCLAIN To : ALL
Subject: Magnet as Battery Folder : A, "Public Mail"

...just some ideas...please share your thoughts.

Using Gerald's analogy of visualizing a spring in compression and
expansion at the same time, I'm trying to understand magnets. I think
of magnets as batteries which we don't know how to "connect" to, yet.

Magnetizers electrically "slam" material with capacitive discharges.
Material is energy is "solid" form. The "slam" compresses and expands
the energy/material, resulting in an imbalance. The "outside"
continues to try to compress while the "inside" is trying to expand.
That may be why magnets fracture so easily, and why each chip, as in a
hologram, retains all of the characteristics of the whole. A magnet is
in a constant state of trying to collapse into itself, which is why it
attracts ferrous materials which match the patterns of its own lattice
structure.

The "domains" of a magnet are each holographic miniatures of the whole
magnet, held together by the molecular structure of the magnetized
material. When a domain flips, as in the VTA, it reverses the
compression/expansion, releasing electrons from the material. Sweet
has learned how to "connect the battery"... just reverse the process
of magnetization slowly, and collect the electrons that are released
via sympathetic vibration. Even if you could collect just the amount
of energy that is contained in the expansion/compression, without any
of the catalyst electrons, magnets would be excellent, rechargable
power sources.

The problem is that the amount of power needed to "excite" the domain
structures of most magnets exceeds the power out. That is why it is
important to find magnetic resonance as a method of "tripping" the
domains into a controlled energy expansion. All domains, regardless of
the type of magnet, respond to 175KHz, indicating that they all share
the same lattice structure. This is a start, but it is not the
"aggregate". Maybe acoustic vibration at the cavity resonance of a
magnet would also "loosen" the domains, if it were in phase with the
electrical resonance signal. Maybe the resonances have to be applied
from within the magnet to reverse the externally applied force which
created the original imbalance. A round, hollow magnet...like earth,
would permit this. ----------------------------------------
================================================== ==========

[oicu812]

Message 9807 DATE/TIME: 12/11/94 23:04 From : JOEL MCCLAIN To : ALL
Subject: Magnetic Resonance Amplifier Folder : D, "Special Associates
Area Alpha"

Today, to test the validity of the Magnetic Resonance Amplifier, or AC
Battery, either name "works", Norman Wootan and I applied a signal
amplitude to the circuit which would "trip" the components into a
higher level of output. The actual measurements, including power
gains, will be included in a file to be uploaded with a schematic.

However, the circuit design is so simple that many people can build it
from a written description. It only has two parts. The power gain is
between 300-400%, and increases as the load is increased.

The theory of operation can wait until the file is written. For now,
if you want to build it, just connect a piezo in series with a primary
coil that is wrapped around a barium ferrite magnet. Connect the
secondary to a bridge rectifier, and the bridge to a DC load. Apply a
signal level AC to the piezo, and adjust the frequency for the peak DC
voltage.

You will find that the AC voltage across either the piezo or the
primary is greater than the voltage from the signal generator. Primary
current is virtually nil due to the piezo, and DC output power is
several times the input power. Today, we measured 0.685W in, with
2.75W out. We used this to run a DC motor which consumed 2.5W, and to
light a DC lamp very brightly. This is hard output DC. As we increased
the potential from the sig gen, current dropped even lower, and output
power increased, which improved the power gain ratio.

Norm and I plan to exhibit this at the next KeelyNet meeting. If you
have any questions before the file is created, please address them to
either me or to Norm. We worked together on this, and it took the
symmetry of both of us to get it into operation. We think that it can
make a difference.

Joel ----------------------------------------
================================================== ==========

Message 9812 DATE/TIME: 12/12/94 07:22 From : NORMAN WOOTAN --
RECEIVED -- To : JOEL MCCLAIN Subject: Magnetic Resonance Amplifier
Folder : A, "Public Mail"

Joel:

This morning I went back through the message base to pull out the
thread of our research on this magnetic resonance amplifier. It is
interesting to note how everything is entertwined and related when you
try to sit back and determine how we arrived at this turning point.

We began this "odsey" back playing with the Perkins Rotory Pump and
your message #9490 "Water Dissociation" useing the barium titanate
transducer.

Think about the severe shock you got last night when you grabed the
transducer running at free resonance around 40KHZ and putting out 300
volts. You were getting dissociation of water for it goes right back
to "Puharich" and the Danart1 file ala Keely. We followed this line of
investigation into the "scalar" test of the center tapped Tesla coil
and were successful in duplicating the Russian single transmission
line "scalar" effect.

Then enter the Neiper Ring, where we got into the antigravity aspects
of this circuit which led to the investigation of the resonating of
the silicone in the transistors, "crystaline lattice" resonance. This
led to the idea of creating "virtual rotation" of the crystaline
lattices in magnetic fields which were also in resonant vibration (
compound resonances). Startring to sound like Keely ?

Enter the Tetrahedron coil which gives "virtual rotation" and "scalar"
effects. The Neiper ring is the key piece that triggered the main line
of investigation the way I see it. There are 54 messages that flew
around among several folks out there that "proded" the grey matter
into action.

I guess the key to the puzzle was your discovery of the basic
"ferromagnetic resonant frequency" that could be used to unlock the
energy that is locked into permanent magnets. I realy like the line of
conversation that we had last night re- the idea of a car that ran on
our permanent magnetic "pile" which over a year of operation would
slowly deplete the magnetism of the "pile and all you had to do was
pull into a service station where an attendant would plug into the
pile a capacitive discharge unit and re-magnitize the "pile to full
strength and away we could go for another year of free driving.

I can't help but go back to Dan Davidson's book on the "Theta" devices
that he was researching where the barium ferrite in these devices
would "sacrifice" over a long period to provide the energy that we
were enjoying.

Since we are useing the magnetic material as a gate-way or "flux gate"
to the ZPE or Space Background Vaccuum then we simply recharge the
magnet when it becomes depleted. I think Hal Puthoff will be proud of
this one for it directly verifies all his theories of the tapping of
the Space Vaccuum Energy.

I guess we need now to select the messages that made this entire line
of research culminate in the results that we now see as real ZPE
tapping.

Thoughts, ideas ??

PS: Credit is certainly due to the central figure that "lurks" behind
all this, "John Keely"

Norm ----------------------------------------
================================================== ==========

Message 9822 DATE/TIME: 12/12/94 14:05 From : JOEL MCCLAIN To : ALL
Subject: Re: Upload of MRA.ZIP Folder : A, "Public Mail"

This is the MRA device, ascii file and pcx schematic.
----------------------------------------
================================================== ==========


================================================== ========= BEGINNING
OF MRA.ASC as released by KeelyNet ---
================================================== ========= File Name:
MRA.ASC Online Date :12/13/94 Contributed by : Joel McClain Dir
Category:ENERGY From : KeelyNet BBS DataLine214) 324-3501
KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 A FREE
Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following requires the file MRA.GIF also on KeelyNet. The file
MRA.ZIP contains both this file MRA.ASC and the image MRA.GIF.
----------------------------------------------------------------

***** Please NOTE!!*****

This is a preliminary report that will be followed by updates with
more detail. Future versions will include various measurements of the
components used in the ciruit that is currently running. From all
appearances at this date, the circuit components will simply give
varying outputs and do not appear to be all that critical.

It was felt that this information should be released to the public as
rapidly as possible, rather than risk loss of the information or the
demo by 'circumstances' beyond our control.There have been too many
discoveries which have disappeared by not being openly shared. We
would rather risk being 'flamed' by other experimenters who actually
BUILD THE CIRCUIT than take the chance of the information being lost
by keeping it within a select group.

Our two primary fears are that someone will attempt to patent what is
intended to be a gift to humanity, possibly with an intent to profit
from others work or to lock it away, the other that it might be
suppressed in some other fashion.

Therefore, the widest possible distribution is requested, and
duplication attempted wherever possible.At the time of this correction
to the original file, we have confirmation as to the numbers and
others are working on the circuit on their own. Please take this
information in the spirit of how it is given, as a gift to humanity.

The inventors are Joel McClain and Norman Wootan. You can contact them
via KeelyNet or directly.

The circuit is being tested at various levels and attempts at
duplication are under way.At this point, there is only one circuit. We
will openly post other successful duplications or failures. Please
feel free to try it yourself. The cost is minimal.

One other point, the crystal transducer was thought to be barium
titanate and there is reason to believe it is in fact titanium
zirconate.These are disc shaped, about 3" in diamter with a 1"
diameter hole in the center.The disc is about 3/8" thick and is coated
with silver on both sides.Thank you for your open-mindedness. They are
advertised in the back of many electronics magazines for about $5
each. We have access to a small stock and might offer them for
experiments should people ask for them.

Good luck and SEIZE THE DAY!

[oicu812]

The Magnetic Resonance Amplifier (MRA)

Discovered and proven December 12, 1994 and shared with the world on
December 13, 1994

by Joel McClain and Norman Wootan

MRA is the Magnetic Resonance Amplifier.With low level ultrasonic
input signals, the MRA produces usable direct current power at levels
above unity. This circuit is based upon the work and theories of John
Ernst Worrell Keely, and is offered into the public domain in his
memory.

Without lengthy discussion about the ether, tetrahedral geometric
virtual rotation, mass aggregate resonance or the rule of nines, it is
possible to understand this circuit as basically a tuned magnetic and
quartz amplifier.

However, it WAS necessary to study those subjects in order to design
and build the MRA, so if you want to fully realize how it works, avail
yourself of the files on KeelyNet which contain all of that and much,
much more.

In the schematic, MRA.GIF, there is a tunable low power oscillator,
which supplies a signal to one side of a barium titanite
transducer.The opposite side of the transducer is connected to a
primary coil, which is wrapped around a barium ferrite magnet core.The
opposite end of the primary goes back to the oscillator.

A secondary is wrapped around the primary, and is connected to an
ordinary bridge rectifier, and the output of the bridge is applied to
a DC load.A filter capacitor can be used on the output of the bridge,
and was used on the MRA which we built.Additionally, a load resistor
across the capacitor will keep the output DC from getting too high as
the circuit is tuned.We found that a 30 ohm, 10 watt resistor was
sufficient.

Once this has been assembled, put a voltmeter across the output
resistor to monitor the voltage rise as the circuit is tuned. Adjust
the oscillator frequency to provide the highest DC output. During this
process, be aware that the voltages across the piezo and the coil will
be VERY MUCH HIGHER than the signal level which you are applying.We
have seen combined voltages of almost 1000VAC with only 30VAC of
signal input.

When the circuit is tuned, the magnet will be "singing" at around 8000
to 11000Hz.If the piezo sings, you are exceeding its power
capabilities, and will need to reduce the number of turns on your
primary.The frequency that resonates both the piezo and the magnet at
optimum resonance will be three times (three octaves above) the
frequency at which the magnet is singing. This is the nine harmonics
that are mentioned in the Rule of Nines.

To test the circuit, place a precision, high wattage, low ohm resistor
in series with the output from the oscillator to the piezo, and
measure the voltage drop.It should be very small, less than 0.1VAC.Use
this value to determine current in the series circuit, and then
calculate power.

Next, measure the DC voltage across your output load resistor, and
once again calculate power.You should be between three to four times
above the previously calculated input power.

Once the circuit is in operation, you will note that the voltage will
vary by 0.1VDC or more, depending upon the time of day. This is due to
the nature of etheric forces inherent to the earth's magnetic field.
Watch for peak voltage at or before sunrise.

In our circuit, we measured 0.084VAC drop across a two ohm series
resistor, for a total of 0.685W dissipation in the primary. With this,
we attained 2.75W of output power, and used this to drive a lamp and a
motor. Increasing the signal voltage had the effect of decreasing the
primary current while boosting output power, thus improving the power
gain ratio. We believe that larger power systems can be built by using
larger coils, more piezos, and a lower frequency, as long as the
aggregate combination is within the resonant frequency range of the
components.

The MRA is essentially a means of releasing the electrical energy
stored in magnets. As such, it is an AC battery with DC output. It can
be used for a portable, self-charging power supply with a solid state
oscillator and rechargable battery. For those who want a synopsis of
the technology, the following paragraphs are offered, but it is
strongly suggested that you follow up this reading with a more
thorough study of the KeelyNet files.

Matter = energy. To change the matter, change the energy. Creating of
a magnet achieved by a process which causes the matter to be both
expanded and compressed at the same time, with the result that a
magnet is in a constant state of collapse. This is why magnets attract
material with similar lattice structures, as they attempt to fill the
energy void which created them. The "domains" of the magnet are fixed
after the process of magnetization, and the only way to extract
electrical energy is to physically spin a coil relative to a magnet.

However, it is also possible to induce virtual rotation by applying
the resonant frequency of the magnet, which causes the lattices and
the domains to vibrate. However, the power required to do this is
greater than the energy released by the virtual rotation. Therefore,
it is necessary to increase the vibration without using excessive
current.

The piezo has a virtually inexhaustable supply of free electrons, and
it releases them when it is stressed. Using the piezo in series with
the primary coil will almost eliminate primary current, because it is
voltage which stresses the piezo, not current. Therefore, the piezo
can be stressed with very little actual power, and provide the current
to the primary coil, which vibrates the domains of the magnet.

The piezo is the catalyst for the circulating current with the primary
coil. The circulating current is additive, and this is the reason for
the high potentials developed across both the piezo and the primary
coil.

It is at this point that resonance becomes important.You MUST have
three octaves of separation between the magnet resonant frequency and
the signal applied to the piezo. The circulating current is rich in
harmonics, and this is necessary for the operation of the circuit.

Although the circuit is simple, it utilizes the concepts of PHI, of
virtual rotation, of tetrahedral geometry, piezo and transformer
theory, and electrical knowledge. It is not suggested as a beginner
project as a result of the high voltages present.For engineers and
technicians of experience, it may be difficult to accept that the MRA
is above unity.The ramifications are emormous.Hopefully, it will help
to build a better world.

[oicu812]

Vangard Note

This device incorporates power multiplication principles using
multiple resonances as claimed by Keely and Hendershott.It also
corresponds in some ways with Floyd Sweet's VTA and Joe Parr's energy
spheres from pyramids.

Joel called Sunday night in an excited state.He and Norman took turns
explaining what they had achieved using this circuit. The power input
measurements were about 600mWatts and yet the circuit was generating
about 2.5 Watts on the output.Norman hooked up a DC motor and he said
it was spinning like crazy in addition to a light bulb glowing
brightly.

Norman was laughing and said they'd beat Harold Puthoffs' One Watt
Challenge as issued at the 1994 ISNE conference in Denver. This has
created quite a bit of excitement and Puthoff now has a FAX'd copy of
the circuit. No doubt it will be everywhere in a very short time. The
hope by Joel and Norman is that others will duplicate the initial
effect and be able to expand on it to derive useful power.

Sweet claimed something on the order of 1:3,000,000 over-unity.The
input power to his device was 10 VAC at 29uamps (290mWatts). The
output had been loaded to as high as 3,000 Watts.

The initial MRA circuit is something on the order of 1:5 and is
believed to be scalable.Joel says the coil he had wound around the
barium ferrite magnet was not in the least precision and he is of the
mind that a huge coil surrounding the magnet will produce a
proportional increase in power.

Early talks with various KeelyNetters about the Sweet circuit led many
of us to believe that Barium, when excited, rings for a long time when
the exciter is removed.At the ISNE conference, Don Watson confirmed
this with his analogy of glowing luciferase as found in fireflys or
other phosphorescent materials.A weak stimulation continues to produce
light for a time after the stimulation is removed.

So, here is a wonderful opportunity to build a pioneering device. If
you have questions or suggestions, you may direct them to Joel McClain
or Norman Wootan at KeelyNet.

I think they both need to be commended for their willingness to share
what many would keep proprietary or die with the secret

.............>>>Jerry

------------------------------------------------------
================================================== ========== END OF
MRA.ASC released by KeelyNet ---
================================================== ==========

================================================== ==========

Message 9850 DATE/TIME: 12/13/94 09:31 From : JOEL MCCLAIN To : ALL
Subject: MRA Input Folder : A, "Public Mail"

For those who plan to build their own MRA, you will have to use sine
wave signal wave input. I've tried square wave, and although the
magnet will "sing", the output DC power will be below unity. I believe
this is because the circuit can't "breathe" evenly with square wave
input. ----------------------------------------
================================================== ==========

Message 9875 DATE/TIME: 12/13/94 19:23 From : JOEL MCCLAIN To :
ALL Subject: MRA "Tech Bulletin" Folder : A, "Public Mail"

If you build your own MRA, there are a few things that you should know
that aren't in the file yet...they're still being discovered.

First of all, don't wear your quartz watch while you work on the
MRA,as the quartz will react with the circuit and run slow. Secondly,
avoid using scopes for anything except occasional waveform checks,
because there is so much flux in the air that it will buildup on the
scope and skew your display.

Thirdly, use a hand-heletr as opposed to a panel meter if you can
because the flux buildup on a panel meter chassis will destroy the
front end transistors... I know, as I did it.

Fourth, the constant ringing will drive you nuts and give you a
head-ache in short order.

Fifth, if you take the piezo out of the circuit after it has been on
for a while, as it cools, it will keep building up charges, and will
bite you when you pick it up.

Sixth, if the piezo screeches, shut the MRA down and wait for a while
before you start it up again. The piezos are bad tempered if you
overdrive them, and will sulk for a while before they work right.

This ain't your daddy's oldsmobile...we're still learning to drive it
so there may be more of these "field bulletins".

Joel ----------------------------------------
================================================== ==========

Message 9876 DATE/TIME: 12/13/94 20:00 From : NORMAN WOOTAN To : BILL
BEATY Subject: MRA Folder : A, "Public Mail"

Bill: Point well taken. We will prove out the circuit and you will
know by the message traffic as to our progress. We all value your
input and guidance therefore jump in and help us out as we sort this
beast out.

I have a very similar circuit to Joel's and we compare notes
constantly. I wound a coil on a barium ferrite magnet with my windings
running parallel to the "bloch wall" where Joel's coil has the
windings running perpendicular to the "bloch wall". My I/O ratio so
far as I can determine is around 12:1 which is some improvement but we
need testing.

Bert Pool just left to go and build a similar circuit so the more
folks that build, test and improve on the design the better.

Thanks again.

Norm ----------------------------------------
================================================== ==========

Message 9879 DATE/TIME: 12/14/94 00:10 From : JOEL MCCLAIN -- RECEIVED
-- To : JEFF PANICI Subject: (R) Piezo pooped out Folder : A, "Public
Mail"

Hi Jeff,

Actually, the piezo is titanium zirconate...that was a blooper.

And, all of the materials are from the "gadget god" himself, Norman
Wootan.

I have no idea where hw fets this stuff, I'm just extremely glad that
he does!

Joel

cc: Norman Wootan

[oicu812]

Message 9882 DATE/TIME: 12/14/94 08:17 From : NORMAN WOOTAN To : ALL
Subject: MRA (Tech Bulletin) Folder : A, "Public Mail"

Since Joel and I have created a lot of interest in the MRA device we
will place everything on line so that no "stone is left unturned".

Long ago I saw a sci-fi movie of a suitcase size device that you could
plug any size AC load into it and it would power it with no problem. I
dreamed of building such a device by imploying a block of natural
quartz with a mechanical oscillator attached to all faces (Tesla
oscillator) to force the quartz to yield free electrons. I envisioned
the output (high voltage) to be stored in a capacitor bank (1 kilo
joule) them the output going into an inverter circuit and stepdown
transformer to take this piezo generated voltage down to a useful AC
voltage.

Now Joel and I have combined this effect to the resonating of the
lattice structure of a magnet to sum the outputs of the piezo effect
and the ferro-resonant effect to give an over-unity total at the
bridge rectifier.

Last night Bert Pool came over to gather up the needed supplies to
build a prototype circuit to do independent evaluation. After I had
run the circuit through the paces noting the outputs and thoroughly
discussing what we thought was going on here I turned off the meters,
scopes and the signal generator and finally went to bed.

Well I woke up a 2:00AM with a headache, went to get the tylenol and
went into the room with the test rig on the bench. I turned on the
frequency counter and found that the circuit was running in free
oscillation with no input. Although no power was being produced the
free running oscillations were filling my living space with a high
freq ultrasonic squeal that as Joel has warned will give you a migrane
headache in short order.

The free oscillation was around 44KHZ with the freq counter ranging up
and down (no lock on). I had to take the circuit apart to stop the
ultrasonic ringing. As Joel has pointed out these titanium zirconate
transducers, once set into resonance will continue to ring for a long
period.

Since there is possible some conditioning taking place within the
crystaline structure of the material I believe that over a long
conditioning period (burn in time) the whole circuit can be make
sensitive to a combination of two frequencies that are necessary. The
first freq involved is the input to drive the transducer which has to
be 3 octaves down from the fundamental natural frequency of the
ferro-magnetic resonant frequency.

Although it has not been mentioned before in "A" public on this net,
Joel and I were successful in isolating and identifying the
fundamental Ferromagnetic Resonant Frequency as being around 174.9
KHZ. Dosen't it sound ironic that this freq should fall so close to
what the Corums have determined that Tesla designed his big coil out
in Colorado springs around? I have read several articles that
speculated that the ferromagnetic freq or the earth natural magnetic
field resonated around 180KHZ. With this 174.9 freq in mind we have
applied the Joel McClain "Rule of Nines" to the circuit where we run
the transducer at a freq that is a multiple of the fundamental 174.9
ferroresonant freq. His circuit is running at a fifth and mine is
running at a third.

Example- I input a sine wave signal at 2.28 V AC into the series
resonant circuit at 59070HZ and get a voltage developed across the
transducer of 26.04V and a voltage across the coil of 24.02 with an
output voltage from the bridge rectifier of 30.2 V DC. If every thing
is running in an ideal phase relationship (transducer oscillations and
ferro-coil oscillations) then the beat freq will partially sum the two
voltages since they are in a series circuit and set up a circulating
current in the primary which when the primary winding and the
secondary windings have the proper impedance matching will extract the
maximum amout of energy from the circulating current in the
transformer into a healthy output at the bridge which is far
OVER-UNITY, high I/O ratio. My circuit is showing a 13:1 ratio at this
time and I have not even approached a good impedance match in the
windings.

A real sharp RF engineer could sort all the details out in short
order. I don't profess to be an RF engineer but have a good background
in electronics. This is the reason for Joel and I going "PUBLIC
DOMAIN" with the circuit so that some highly skilled folks out there
can take this circuit and help develope it into something of practical
use. We don't want PROFIT motivated people to "rip" off the idea for
self gain. We want any potential benefits of the circuit to remain
free for the taking.

More notes as we learn more. As Joel says, "we are like teanagers
learning to drive dads olds". A little help from interested fellow
researchers is welcome.

[oicu812]

Message 9883 DATE/TIME: 12/14/94 09:19 From : NORMAN WOOTAN To : ALL
Subject: MRA (Tech Bulletin) Folder : A, "Public Mail"

In our discussion of the MRA circuit we keep referring to the key part
of the circuit as being a transducer. Let me clarify this a litle for
I know there are a lot of folks out there who will be running around
looking for that same device that we have.

First let's settle the confusion about the type of material involved.
Jerry Decker and I bought some of these devices from Tanner
Electronics here in Dallas and were told that they were BARIUM
TITANATE transducers made for the ultra-sonic heads in the ultra-sonic
welders used in the plastics industry. There are numerous
manufacturers of such welding devices in which they stack these
devices (each rated at 50 Watts) to get the total power needed to weld
plastic by kinetic contact heating.

A physical description is: 2 inch outside diameter round eith a 5/8 th
inch hole through the center with a thickness of 3/16 th inch with
silver layered on each side which is convenient for soldering leads to
the transducer.

When employing these units they have to be suspended to that they are
free to resonate. Don't lay them on a table or surface for this will
dampen the free oscillations. We have not consulted an acoustical
engineer to determine the best way to mount the units or attach the
I/O leads so as to provide the optimum free resonances. We have
discussed the employment of tuned pipes of the proper wave length
ratios needed to enhance the free resonant or targeted resonance that
we desire. I have even thought of a mechanical type of tuning fork
device that would give us the Tesla described "CHILD ON THE SWING"
type drive that would give the maximum output with the least possible
input (wattage I/O). A good microwave engineer would possibly come up
with a tuned cavity resonator which would drive the transducer at the
optimum phase to extract the energy needed to drive the
ferro-rersonant coil in the primary.

The magnet that Joel is useing is from an IBM hard drive and is as
follows: 7 inches long X 2 inches X 2 inches with the magnetic "Bloch
wall" across the thickness. For those out there who may never heard
the term "Block wall" it means the neutral plane in a magnet. The
magnetic orientation is across the thickness of the magnetic therefore
cannot be described as a bar magnet which has it's magnetic
orientation along the long axis. By useing a magnet which has the flux
across the thickness and the windings are wound around the center of
the long axis we have a coil which is wound with half of the winding
turn in a "N" field and the other half of the turn in a "S" field.
Makes no difference since the objective here is to ring the magnet
into a resonant freq and it seems to me that it is easier to ring
(mechanically) with the ends of the long axis protruding from the
coil. In other words the "Node point" is under the coil with the free
ends oscillating. There are several ways to suspend a bar that is in
free resonance. All you have to do is open your door chime and look at
how the chime bar is mounted to extract the maximum acoustical energy
from the hammer strike. The same objective applies here so there is a
lot of work to be done to maximize this device. It is public so YOU
can help sort it all out.

Joel is useing 150 turns in the primary and secondary of his
ferro-magnetic transformer. Experimentation will provide the ideal
ratios and impedance matching. Get with the program and provide free
exchange of findings so all may benefit.

Norm ----------------------------------------
================================================== ==========

Message 9884 DATE/TIME: 12/14/94 09:54 From : NORMAN WOOTAN To : ALL
Subject: MRA (Tech Bulletin) Folder : A, "Public Mail"

I forgot to clear up one important point ehich really means nothing or
maybe it is important. As I said Jerry Decker and I were told that the
Transducers were BARIUM TITANATE but thanks to Dan Davidson out in AZ
we're told that these transducers were infact TITANIUM ZIRCONATE.

I guess some of you can consult the manufactures of this equipment to
clear up this point. Branson is the largest builders of ultasonic
cleaners ans welders so there is a starting poin to nail down the
exact type of material we are dealing with. "Cross all the T's and Dot
all the I's"

Norm ----------------------------------------
================================================== ==========

Message 9886 DATE/TIME: 12/14/94 12:15 From : JOEL MCCLAIN -- RECEIVED
-- To : NORMAN WOOTAN Subject: Power Test Folder : A, "Public Mail"

Hi Norm,

Did another test to determine the actual power gain of the MRA, this
time a resistive circuit equivalency test. Measurd the E drop with the
MRA in the path of the signal source, and substituted resistors for
the MRA until the drop was the same, and computed power.

The signal source dropped from 27.5 to 26 VAC with the MRA connected,
and it took 250 ohms of resistance to achieve the same drop. Power in
an AC circuit is E X I X PF, so 26 X .104 X .707 = 1.89W.

Measured DC power out is 22VDC X .14A = 3.08W, for a net gain of
1.19W, which still meets the "challenge", and ain't too bad all things
considered, sloppy coil winding, etc. Oh well, there's lots of
opportunity to improve it, now that the door is open.

Joel