HHO vs HCS

[okto2005]

Hey brothers...

Im googling and found some articles about HCS (HydroCarbon Crack System), the inventor from indonesia :)

The idea look like HHO, but for releasing The Carbon and Hydrogen using catalyst camber which first preheat the chamber by exhaust muffler...

and some people out there comparing with HHO. and the result, vehicles with HCS more efficient than HHO. FC (Fuel Comsumption) for kpl mpg increase.

I Just ask anyone here, who has prove it?

google search:
http://www.google.co.id/images?q=hho%20vs%20hcs&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&hl=id&tab=wi&biw=1024&bih=581

Here the chart:
http://www.auliabig.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/hho-tes-300x191.jpg

[Roland Jacques]

I have played with it very briefly, and it does work to a degree. I had the intention to try it on a truck but did not go though with it. The reason is the idea of driving around with a gas tank in the engine compartment is too dangerous to me.
One good size accident, or a flash back, and you could catch your car on fire and possible worse. Personally i don't think it is worth the risk. I think you can get similar results with the same type of modification they use (super heating vapors) but using water/steam instead. Much safer and possible as good or better results