PDA

View Full Version : Chrysler's LEAN BURN ENGINE



BoyntonStu
06-04-2009, 09:13 AM
The Chrysler Lean Burn engine control system: first onboard auto computer
http://www.allpar.com/mopar/lean-burn.html

Chrysler's Electronic Lean-Burn System, with its electronic spark control, was cited as providing:
• Smooth engine warm-ups
• Improved engine performance
• Improved smoothness of engine operation
• Controlled emissions-even before they reach the exhaust system
• Less emission-control "hardware": several responsive sensors feed information to an electronic computer to keep the lean-burn engine performing efficiently.
The system measured:
• 1. Engine speed (r.p.m.). As engine speed increases, spark plugs must be fired sooner for the engine power and efficiency needed. This sensor reads engine speed and signals the computer to adjust spark timing accordingly.
• 2. Engine load. This sensor signals the computer to advance the spark for optimum fuel economy at part throttle.
• 3. Throttle position. This electronic sensor reads accelerator pedal position and signals the computer to advance the spark under conditions when speed and load alone do not give the correct signal.
• 4. Speed of throttle movement. This sensor signals the computer to advance the timing briefly in anticipation of the desired acceleration. The faster the acceleration, the longer the duration of extra advance. There is no lag.
• 5. Air temperature entering the engine. As outside air enters the engine, its temperature is monitored by a sensor which signals the computer to advance the timing at cooler temperatures to enhance fuel economy and retard it at warmer ones to protect against destructive detonation or pre-ignition.
• 6. Engine coolant temperature. This sensor tells the computer to limit spark advance during engine warm-up while the choke is on. This helps control emissions.
• 7. Carburetor throttle open' or closed. This sensor operates a timing counter which remembers how long and how often the throttle is open or closed. It allows full spark advance at highway speeds but in city driving spark advance is modulated to control exhaust emissions.
• 8. Engine starting. This sensor tells the computer when the engine has started and advances the timing for about one minute to cut down on engine stalls.
The electronic spark-control computer responds to data from all sensors and instantly adjusts the timing of spark¬plug firings. Since conditions are constantly changing, the computer is constantly making instantaneous adjustments in spark-plug firings.

This second-generation spark-control computer consists of one integrated circuit board which computes all vital information for controlling the .ignition system. It eliminates the starting pick-up coil and the centrifugal advance flyweights from the distributor. Information for these functions is programmed into the spark-control computer and is performed electronically. The electronic circuitry for electronic ignition is also contained in the spark-control computer.

Examples of the system in operation:
1. The engine is cold. The coolant sensor tells the computer, which retards the spark so the engine isn't putting out a lot of pollution while the choke is on.
2. The engine coolant warms up. The sensor reports to the computer and the spark is advanced.
3. The engine is started in the morning and the car is driven away. Sensors tell the computer to provide spark advance to get you going.
4. Driving up a hill or pulling a trailer. The engine load sensor reads manifold vacuum and tells the computer whether the engine needs less spark advance to prevent detonation when pulling up the hill-or more spark advance going down the other side. Responsive spark timing does the job.
5. Driving on an interstate highway. The spark is advanced.
6. Rapidly depressing the accelerator. The sensor signals the computer to instantly advance the spark for more power to accelerate the car. There's no lag in spark advance like you get in ordinary engines.
The invention

The patent was granted in August 8, 1978, listing Gordon Fenn as the inventor. Marc Rozman told us that Gordon Fenn had come up with the system very quickly, and had also worked on substantial improvements to the 1980-81 Imperial electronic fuel injection system (after its introduction, to make it workable on vehicles in the field).

According to the patent, signals used to control spark timing included “a throttle advance signal, a programmed vacuum advance signal, a break-idle advance signal, an engine start advance signal, an engine speed advance signal and a fixed timing signal. These signals are algebraically summed together to develop a resultant spark timing signal representing desired spark timing. Individual signals are derived from transducer circuits which are responsive to various engine operating and/or ambient conditions.”

The throttle advance included both throttle position and rate, increasing advance as the throttle opened; it was attenuated as the ambient air got hotter.
“The break-idle advance signal provides momentary advance when the engine throttle is displaced from the idle position. The engine start advance signal provides advance for a short interval after the engine has been started. The engine speed advance signal provides increasing advance as the engine speed increases. The fixed timing signal provides fixed timing which is used to adjust the basic timing for a given set of engine operating conditions. The control system is particularly advantageous when used in an engine which uses a leaner fuel-air mixture (17-18:1, for example) in comparison to presently used mixtures (15-16:1). Improvement accrues by way of reduction in exhaust emission products and better fuel economy.”


BoyntonStu

BoyntonStu
06-04-2009, 09:18 AM
Green Engine Technology - Petrol Engines
http://www.autozine.org/technical_school/engine/petrol1.htm
Lean Burn Engine
Basically, engines which can operate in very lean air / fuel mixture are called "Lean Burn Engines". Japanese car makers, heading by Toyota, are the leaders in this technology.
Apparently, the leaner air / fuel mixture, the more frugal the engine is. But there are two reasons prevent conventional engines from operating in lean air / fuel mixture:

1. If the mixture is too lean, the engine will fail to combust.
2. Naturally, lower fuel concentration leads to less output.
.
Lean burn engines avoid these problems by adopting a highly efficient mixing process. They use special shape pistons, with intake manifolds located and angled matching the pistons, the intake air will generate swirl inside the combustion chamber. Swirl leads to more complete mixing of fuel and air, thus largely reduce the badly-mixed fuel particles, which will not be burnt in conventional engines. This enables more complete burning, not only reduces pollutant, but also allow the fuel / air ratio to be lowered from 1 : 14 to 1 : 25 without altering output.
Today, Lean Burn technology has evolved into Direct Injection, which is basically the former added with direct fuel injection. Toyota, Mitsubishi and Nissan all concentrate in DI engines development.
________________________________________
Direct Injection Petrol engine - Mitsubishi GDI
Mitsubishi is currently the leader of GDI (Gasoline Direct Injection) technology. It has already applied GDI in different engines, from 1.5-litre four to 4.5-litre V8. Now most of its production engines are GDI-equipped.
Mitsubishi claimed GDI consumes 20 to 35% less fuel, generates 20% less CO2 emission and 10% more power than conventional engines. How can it be so magical ? The following paragraphs will tell you its secret.
Theory of GDi
Gasoline direct injection technology is one of the branches of "Lean Burn Technology". What it differs with Lean Burn is the adoption of directly fuel injection system.
Direct fuel injection has been used in diesel engines for many years, but not in petrol engine until recently. Inherently, direct injection has two advantages :

1. Since the fuel is injected under high pressure directly into the combustion chamber, just before ignition by the spark plug, this allows the precise control of charge stratification vital to ignite ultra-lean air / fuel mixtures.
2. Direct injection also dispenses with the need for a throttle, so eliminating the pumping loss associated with drawing air around a conventional engine's butterfly valve.
.
In conventional engines, fuel injectors, even in MPi (multi-point injection) designs, the injected fuel pulverise in the intake port (near intake valves) before entering the combustion chambers. Why not directly inject into the cylinder ? because it is impossible to spread the fuel uniformally in everywhere. On the contrary, inject into the main entrance (intake port) assures all air mix with fuel in the same rate.
How can Mitsubishi applied direct injection without such problem? Let us look at the following diagrams:................

BoyntonStu

BoyntonStu
06-04-2009, 09:25 AM
"Lean burn engines do not work well with modern 3-way catalytic converters, which require a balance of pollutants at the exhaust port in order to carry out both oxidation and reduction reactions, so most modern engines run at or near the stoichiometric point."

From Wiki


Thus, our cars must send polluted emissions to the catalytic converter in order to allow it to do its job and "clean" the exhaust.


Funny world, isn't it?


BoyntonStu

Painless
06-04-2009, 11:05 AM
"Lean burn engines do not work well with modern 3-way catalytic converters, which require a balance of pollutants at the exhaust port in order to carry out both oxidation and reduction reactions, so most modern engines run at or near the stoichiometric point."

From Wiki


Thus, our cars must send polluted emissions to the catalytic converter in order to allow it to do its job and "clean" the exhaust.


Funny world, isn't it?


BoyntonStu
I couldn't agree with you more, apparently, the 14.7:1 ratio is needed to provide enough unburnt fuel for the catalytic converter to burn off some of the emissions.

Awesome design... *cough*

I move that the key to better emissions in a gasoline engine is to increase the amount of gasoline that is being combusted within the injected charge. This equates to more power and less harmful emissions. Leaning the fuel mixture in conjunction with technologies that allow for more complete combustion makes sense to me as being good for the environment.

Q-Hack!
06-04-2009, 02:58 PM
One of the big problems with this concept is that in order for HHO to be a cleaner burning option, it has to outperform the cat. I am not saying it is impossible, but once you start reducing the un-burnt fuel to the cat it can no longer do its job and so you are left with requiring the HHO doing a complete burn. I suspect it is going to take more HHO to accomplish this than we are currently generating.

Boyntonstu: Did you ever do that pick-up truck test that you were talking about several months ago? The one where you set up a generator and HHO cell in the back; such that it doesn't load down the engine. If we could figure out just how much HHO it takes to actually get an engine to burn cleaner, it might help our understanding of this problem.