Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 61 to 65 of 65

Thread: Discouraged by 'NAY SAYERS'

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    490
    Quote Originally Posted by Painless View Post
    Stevo,
    Looks like things have been taken care of already.

    Anyone for HHO?
    Indeed. I'm in.

  2. #62
    solo33 Guest

    Angry Coatholders

    In ham radio, we call these people coat holders! The come into a nice conversation or discussion and start attacking people, turn the whole thing into mayhim, and stand back laughing. The best thing to do is don't recognise him, he doesn't exist. Keep going with your topic. He'll go find another group to poke with his sharp stick.

  3. #63
    Quote Originally Posted by solo33 View Post
    In ham radio, we call these people coat holders! The come into a nice conversation or discussion and start attacking people, turn the whole thing into mayhim, and stand back laughing. The best thing to do is don't recognise him, he doesn't exist. Keep going with your topic. He'll go find another group to poke with his sharp stick.
    That's a very good idea and I have already taken that position. I won't waist a post on him anymore. He doesn't exist.

  4. #64
    Clipper Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Scooterdog View Post
    Not one mention of hho lol.
    You obviously couldn't be bothered to click on the link in the original post:

    http://www.hydrofuelsolutions.com/Go..._releases.html

    which states that:

    "California Environmental Engineering (CEE) has tested this technology and found reduction on all exhaust emissions. They subsequently stated: "CEE feels that the result of this test verifies that this technology is a viable source for reducing emissions and fuel consumption on large diesel engines."

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    311
    Quote Originally Posted by Clipper View Post
    You obviously couldn't be bothered to click on the link in the original post:

    http://www.hydrofuelsolutions.com/Go..._releases.html

    which states that:

    "California Environmental Engineering (CEE) has tested this technology and found reduction on all exhaust emissions. They subsequently stated: "CEE feels that the result of this test verifies that this technology is a viable source for reducing emissions and fuel consumption on large diesel engines."
    You're too late dude he's been run outa town.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •